Totality Through Time
Copyright© 2026 by Art Samms
Chapter 8
I stopped trying to convince people. Not because I believed I was wrong, but because I finally understood that being right didn’t matter if nothing changed.
Words had reached their limit—with Moreau, with the clerks, even with Elise. Every argument I made dissolved into doubt or deflection, absorbed into a system that did not recognize danger until it became damage.
So, I changed tactics. If I couldn’t persuade, I would intervene.
I returned to the factory the next morning. And the morning after that, and again the day after.
Not as a visitor this time, not as an observer guided politely through curated pathways, but as something quieter. I learned the rhythms of the place—when the supervisors were distracted, when the workers rotated, when attention drifted just enough for something small to go unnoticed.
I moved through it like a problem to be solved. Mapping first. Always mapping.
I began to understand the layout not as a collection of rooms, but as a system—flow, load, pressure. Where power entered. How it split, how it traveled, where it accumulated. Which components were original, which had been added later, which were strained beyond what they were meant to carry.
The resemblance to the corrupted image I had seen sharpened with each visit. It wasn’t exact, but close enough.
Too close.
The first time I interfered, it was almost insignificant.
A connection along one of the secondary lines—tight, but not quite secure. It carried more load than it should have, feeding into a junction that had clearly been modified to accommodate increased demand.
I waited until the area cleared, then loosened it. Not enough to fail immediately. Just enough to introduce instability.
The effect came later. A fluctuation. A drop. A complaint from one of the workers that something wasn’t holding steady. They shut down that section briefly, inspected it, found the connection, tightened it properly.
For a moment, I felt something close to satisfaction. A problem identified. Corrected.
But when the system came back online, I saw what I had missed. The load didn’t disappear. It merely shifted. It had been redistributed along adjacent lines—lines that were already under strain.
The system adapted. Not safely. Just effectively enough to continue.
The second attempt was more deliberate.
A junction box mounted too close to a structural beam—heat had already begun to discolor the metal around it. I had seen the signs clearly this time: stress, accumulation, a failure waiting for the right conditions.
I drew attention to it—but not directly.
I mentioned it to a worker in passing, framing it as curiosity, a question rather than a warning. He frowned, checked it himself, then called over a supervisor.
This time, the response was more substantial.
They shut the section down longer. Opened the box. Replaced part of the wiring.
For a moment, it felt like progress. Until I saw how they reassembled it.
The new wiring was cleaner, yes. Better insulated. But to accommodate it, they rerouted the line—closer to another system, one that introduced a different kind of risk.
The original problem was gone. A new one had taken its place.
The third time, I tried something broader: a delay.
I interfered with a delivery—nothing dramatic, just enough confusion to hold back a set of components that were meant to expand one of the primary circuits. Without them, the installation couldn’t proceed as scheduled.
For a day, the pace slowed. Work stalled in that section, workers redirected elsewhere, pressure easing just slightly across the system.
I allowed myself to think, briefly, that I had found a way to disrupt the pattern.
Then the components arrived, and the response was immediate. Work accelerated to compensate for lost time. Corners were cut to regain momentum. The installation was completed faster than it would have been originally. And with less care.
The system didn’t just return to its previous state. It overshot it.
Each attempt followed the same pattern. Identify a weakness. Intervene. Watch it correct itself, only to create a new weakness somewhere else.
Nothing I did disappeared. It propagated.
What unsettled me most wasn’t that the factory remained dangerous. It was that it was becoming more so.
Moreau’s influence was everywhere, even when he wasn’t physically present. The pressure to meet demand—to push output higher as the Exposition drew larger crowds—filtered down through every level of the operation.
Temporary fixes became permanent. Shortcuts became standard. Additions layered over existing systems without removing what had come before.
The factory was no longer a single structure. It was an accumulation. And with each layer, the margin for error shrank.
One afternoon, I stood along the upper walkway overlooking the central floor, watching the movement below. The noise was constant—machinery, voices, the low hum of current moving through systems not entirely designed to carry it. Heat rose in waves, distorting the air just enough to blur the edges of everything.
From this vantage point, the structure revealed itself more clearly. Not as a series of parts, but as a network. Lines crossing lines, loads feeding into loads, everything interconnected in ways that were no longer simple.
I traced it with my eyes, following pathways, anticipating where stress would concentrate.
At first, I looked for a single point. A failure I could isolate. A moment I could prevent. But the longer I watched, the more that idea unraveled.
There was no single point. No clean break.
The image from the camera returned to me—not as a static fragment this time, but as something I began to understand differently. Sparks, smoke, an iron beam. I had assumed it began there.
Now I saw that it couldn’t. That moment was not the origin. It was the result.
The realization settled slowly, but once it did, it refused to loosen.
The accident was not a single failure. It was the culmination of many. Small stresses, layered over time. Adjustments made under pressure. Decisions that seemed reasonable in isolation, but catastrophic in combination.
I thought of every change I had made. Every connection I had loosened. Every delay I had introduced.
None of them had stopped anything. They had only altered the path. Redirected the strain, and
possibly even accelerated it.
The system hadn’t resisted me in any conscious way. It had simply absorbed what I did and continued forward, reshaping itself to maintain function.
At any cost.
A sharp crack snapped somewhere below—brief, contained, followed by a flicker of light along one of the lines.
No one reacted. A worker glanced up, then returned to his task. Things like this had become normal and expected.
I gripped the railing slightly tighter, my gaze tracking the line where the fluctuation had occurred.
If that surge had been just slightly stronger, or if the conditions had been just slightly worse—
It might have triggered something larger.
I exhaled slowly, forcing my focus outward, away from the instinct to isolate and fix. Because that instinct was wrong. I wasn’t dealing with a flaw. I was dealing with a system under pressure. And systems like this didn’t fail because of one mistake. They failed because everything aligned.
Which meant that removing one piece—one wire, one junction, one delay—would never be enough.
The pressure didn’t disappear. It moved. It found another path. Built somewhere else. Until eventually, it found release.
I straightened, stepping back from the railing. For the first time since I had begun interfering, I felt something shift in my understanding. It most definitely was not relief. It wasn’t even clarity. It was something more difficult: acceptance.
I could not stop this by making small changes. I could not outmaneuver it piece by piece. If I wanted to change what I had seen, I would have to confront the system as a whole. Or else, find a way to remove Elise from it entirely.
I turned and made my way back toward the exit, the noise of the factory fading only slightly as I moved away from the central floor.
Behind me, the machinery continued its relentless rhythm, unchanged and uninterrupted. Building toward something I now understood far too well—not a single moment of failure,
but the inevitable release of everything that had been quietly accumulating all along.
I found her in the late afternoon, back at her studio, where the light fell in long, slanting bands through the tall windows and turned everything it touched into something almost deliberate. Canvases leaned against the walls in various stages of completion, charcoal studies layered over one another on the table, the air faintly marked by the scent of graphite and oil.
For a moment, I watched her without speaking.
She stood at her easel, one hand resting lightly against the edge of the canvas, the other moving with measured precision as she worked a line into place. The subject was the factory again—not its exterior this time, not the controlled façade Moreau preferred to present, but something more interior. Structural. The suggestion of beams and conduits, forms intersecting at angles that hinted at movement and strain.
She was already trying to understand it. That made what I had come to say both easier and more difficult.
“Elise,” I said at last.
She glanced over her shoulder, her expression softening slightly when she saw me, though something of the distance from the past few days remained.
“Again, you’ve been avoiding me,” she said.
“Not avoiding,” I replied. “Working.”
She studied me for a moment, as if deciding whether that distinction mattered, then set her charcoal aside.
“On what?”
I stepped further into the room, closing the door quietly behind me.
“On understanding what’s actually happening in that factory,” I said.
Something in my tone must have reached her, because her posture shifted, her attention sharpening in a way that told me she was listening now—not out of politeness, but out of curiosity.
“All right,” she said. “Show me.”
I didn’t begin with the future. Not this time.
I began with what was in front of us.
I moved to the table and pulled a blank sheet toward me, taking up a piece of charcoal more out of necessity than confidence. Drawing had never been my strength, but structure didn’t require elegance. It required clarity.
“This is the main distribution line,” I said, sketching a rough horizontal axis. “Power comes in here, then branches outward through secondary circuits.”
She stepped closer, watching as the lines took shape.
“So far, that’s obvious,” she said.
“It should be,” I replied. “That’s the part that was designed.”
I added additional lines, less evenly spaced, some intersecting at awkward angles.
“These are the modifications,” I continued. “Additions made to increase output. Temporary expansions that became permanent.”
Her brow furrowed slightly as she followed the connections.
“They look ... crowded,” she said.
“They are,” I said. “And they weren’t planned together. Each one solves a short-term problem without considering the system as a whole.”
I marked several junctions with darker strokes.
“These points are carrying more load than they were ever meant to,” I said. “Not because of a single decision, but because of accumulation. Every addition shifts the balance somewhere else.”
She leaned in closer, her gaze moving across the page, tracing the pathways.
“And that creates instability,” she said slowly.
“Yes.”
I added shading around one of the junctions.
“Heat builds here,” I said. “You can see it if you look closely—the metal is already beginning to discolor. It’s not failing yet, but it’s under stress.”
She didn’t speak, but I could feel her attention narrowing further, her mind adjusting to the way I was presenting it.
I moved to another section.
“And here,” I continued, “they’ve rerouted a line after a repair. It’s cleaner, technically more efficient—but now it runs too close to another system. If one fluctuates, it affects the other.”
Her gaze lifted briefly to mine.
“You’ve been inside again,” she said.
“Yes.”
“Repeatedly.”
“Yes.”
She didn’t question it further. Instead, she returned her attention to the drawing, her expression tightening as the implications began to settle.
“This isn’t one problem,” she said.
“No,” I replied. “It isn’t.”
I set the charcoal down and met her eyes.
“It’s a system under pressure,” I said. “And every attempt to fix it in isolation makes it worse somewhere else.”
She was quiet for a long moment. I could see it happening—the shift in perception, the movement from seeing the factory as subject to seeing it as structure. Not just something to observe, but something to understand in terms of forces, interactions, consequences.
When she finally spoke, her voice was lower.
“And this leads to...” she began.
She didn’t finish the sentence. She didn’t need to.
“Yes,” I said.
The word hung between us, heavier than anything I had said before.
For a moment, I thought—hoped—that this would be enough. That seeing it laid out like this, grounded in something tangible and immediate, would tip the balance.
Her hand moved unconsciously toward the edge of the table, fingers resting lightly against the paper.
“This is dangerous,” she said.
“Yes.”
She drew in a slow breath, her gaze still fixed on the drawing.
“And it will fail,” she said.
I didn’t answer immediately.
“Something will,” I said finally. “And when it does, it won’t stay contained.”
Silence settled into the room. Not empty this time—weighted.
I watched her, waiting for the conclusion I thought would follow—for her to step back, to say that she wouldn’t go, that no commission was worth stepping into something like this.
Instead, she straightened. And when she looked at me again, there was something different in her expression. Not denial. Something more deliberate.
“Then I need to see it clearly,” she said.
The words didn’t land the way I expected them to.
“What?” I asked.
“If this is the truth of it,” she continued, gesturing toward the drawing, “then I cannot turn away from it.”
“Elise—”
“If the factory is not what it claims to be,” she said, her voice gaining strength, “if there is risk hidden beneath what people are being shown, then that is exactly what should be documented.”
I stared at her.
“You’re not hearing me,” I said. “This isn’t just a matter of perspective or representation. This could kill you.”
“And leaving means what?” she asked, meeting my gaze without flinching. “That I pretend it does not exist? That I step away and allow it to continue without anyone seeing it for what it is?”
“That’s not what I’m saying.”
“Then what are you saying?” she pressed. “That I save myself and ignore everything else?”
I hesitated. Because when she put it that way, the answer sounded exactly like that.
“Yes,” I said. “If that’s what it takes.”
Something in her expression shifted—not anger, not quite, but something close to it.
“I won’t do that,” she declared.
The words were quiet, but they carried a weight that made it clear they weren’t up for negotiation.
“I won’t live cautiously while something like this continues,” she added. “Not when I have the ability to show it.”
“You don’t have to be there to show it,” I said. “You can work from outside—”
“That would be incomplete,” she said.
“It would be safe.”
“It would be dishonest.”
The word settled between us, cutting through everything else.
For a moment, neither of us spoke. I felt the argument collapsing in on itself, not because I was wrong, but because we were standing on two entirely different foundations. She wasn’t choosing risk out of ignorance. She was choosing it because, to her, the alternative was worse.
And that was something I couldn’t dismantle with logic.
The realization came slowly, but once it did, it settled with a kind of finality I couldn’t ignore.
I was not going to convince her to leave. No matter how clearly I explained it. No matter how much evidence I put in front of her.
She would not step away.
With that point having been made, the tension didn’t break. It shifted. I exhaled, forcing myself to move with it instead of against it.
“Then we need to find another way,” I said.
She watched me carefully. “What do you mean?”
“If you’re going to be there,” I said, “then we reduce the risk as much as possible.”
Her expression softened slightly, not in agreement, but in recognition that I was no longer trying to force a different outcome.
“How?” she asked.
I gestured back toward the drawing.
“The central machinery floor is where the load concentrates,” I said. “If something goes wrong, that’s where it’s most likely to start—or where it will be most dangerous.”
She nodded slowly.
“Then I won’t stay there,” she said.
“Not just that,” I continued. “Limit your time inside. Go in, get what you need, and leave. No lingering. No unnecessary exposure.”
She considered that.
“That is reasonable,” she said.
“And tell me when you’re scheduled to be there,” I added. “Every time. Especially as it gets closer.”
Her gaze held mine for a moment, as if weighing the request not for practicality, but for what it implied.
Then she nodded.
To read the complete story you need to be logged in:
Log In or
Register for a Free account
(Why register?)
* Allows you 3 stories to read in 24 hours.